HAPPY = WOMAN, isn't that what Tiresias said? (Thought there was a 9:1 (decimal) ratio aspect to this, but maybe I've just read too many flaky French femininists)

In AQ! (brilliant job nicholas, hope this is right)

( [IDEA = MAN = ADAM = 55] X 2 ) + 1 = [WOMEN=111=OUTSIDE] = ( 1[=BEING] + DECIMAL ) = 111

northanger - so what do you make of those +1s?
Been thinking about your Pythagorean gendering of the natural numbers - 0 seems especially interesting: both 'even' by expectation (odd number (1) -1) but also neither odd nor even (not divisible by two or of the form 'even number + or -1') - something like the pre-gendered embryo (by default female), pre-sexual life-forms (bacteria, mitochondria), or even more cosmically abstracted 'things' ...

>>> northanger - so what do you make of those +1s?
undercurrent may be heart of matter (quite the multitask master). undercurrent's Q on the baseline is making me read (cos i think it's base9) master crowley's 9th travelogue. but, clue to 111111111 series may ungrund in 10th travelogue.

>>> Been thinking about your Pythagorean gendering of the natural numbers - 0 seems especially interesting: both 'even' by expectation (odd number (1) -1) but also neither odd nor even (not divisible by two or of the form 'even number + or -1')

good observation. similarities (1 | -1) lead straight, um, to zero. kept muttering to self: why be this kept in closet so dam long? Zero is neither positive or negative (correct?). Create there best seems, as Master Yoda always told me.

help me out with this Q: Liber AL I:25. Divide, add, multiply, and understand.

[1] DIVIDE: any number / 0 = 0
[2] ADD: any number by its opposite = 0
[3] MULTIPLY: any number x 0 = 0

is this true?

>>> something like the pre-gendered embryo (by default female), pre-sexual life-forms (bacteria, mitochondria), or even more cosmically abstracted 'things' ...

IUNKNOWN (-9) + ABSTRACTED THINGS (9) = 0
(and for some reason gon equivalence lists 0=ANNULUS)

>>> HAPPY = WOMAN, isn't that what Tiresias said? (Thought there was a 9:1 (decimal) ratio aspect to this, but maybe I've just read too many flaky French femininists)

just call us gals FFF all you want to nicholas! but be nice, it's xmas today. yup, i see 9:1.

>>> 9:1 (decimal) ratio aspect
i was going to say, i see 9:1 too, but that sounded weird.

just checked, Asteroid #912 Maritima (Latin : maritime; of/near/by the sea; costal; relating/used to the sea; seafaring, naval)

will check her position and post that up later

check out my suggestion over at Dread - do away with numbers, use base-26.

northanger -
"DIVIDE: any number / 0" = infinity
(Some ancient Indian mathematicians seem to have been committed to formula '0/0 = 0' but this is considered erroneous by (all?) contemporary mathematicians.)
Is FFF a colour space [or are they 6 figures]?

Undercurrent - heading there now

infinity = qwerty

so is it this?
DIVIDE: any number / 0 = infinity
ADD: any number by its opposite = 0
MULTIPLY: any number x 0 = 0

>>> Is FFF a colour space [or are they 6 figures]?

in CSS, FFF is shortcut for FFFFFF

>Pythagorean gendering
another sideline from the brotherhood - ever looked into which words are excessive, perfect or defective?

>>> another sideline from the brotherhood - ever looked into which words are excessive, perfect or defective?

who me? yeah, garbage in / garbage out

"ever looked into which words are excessive, perfect or defective?" - moving into richer zones of analysis than sheer DR mulch-down (not to dis DR mulch down)

argh
DR MULCH DOWN = TRANSFINITE

>>> "ever looked into which words are excessive, perfect or defective?"

no, but you got me thinking. EXCESSIVE-PERFECT-DEFECTIVE is a 111 or 3 pattern. that's been coming up a lot lately. anything up with that? from nummificator angle could express different ciphers|words. or, how do you encrypt|decrypt?

clarification: 'perfect' numbers=those numbers whose factors sum to themselves (ie 6=(1+2+3)) (triangular numbers) - you can work excessive and defective out for yourselves ;)

>>> clarification: 'perfect' numbers=those numbers whose factors sum to themselves (ie 6=(1+2+3)) (triangular numbers) - you can work excessive and defective out for yourselves ;)

.?.
o-o
.O. oh

northanger - Pythagoras certainly due for a Hyperstition re-run

have to run undercover and get chow, brb

where's uc, where's the nummy?

"where's uc, where's the nummy?" - think it's undergoing another upgrade

it's back, no need to chew your arm off

too late - but i've got a spare

"I want my nummy!"

hello, my name is gwendolyn and i'm addicted to the nummy thingy. i love its exquisite ability to make me laugh & see connections to things never realized before. must be as bad as television ...

GON1 82 = FICTIONS THAT MAKE THEMSELVES REAL = INFALLIBLE DOCTRINE {Nalvage on 48 Angelic Keys}